Interview
with
Helen Van Wyk
By Jan
Claire
In mid-1994 after a hearty
lunch of lobster sandwiches Herb gathered up from
a local Rockport restaurant and brought home, Helen
and I sat down in her private studio for a short while
and just chatted.
Jan
- What do you feel is the real secret behind your
painting success?
Helen
- I don't think I can put my finger on one thing.
The whole secret is the years you spend learning your
craft. It's the same way with a pianist, or a singer
of opera. I like to tell people who ask me how long
it took to finish a painting that it took me 2 days.....and
40 years! But if I had to put it into quick advice,
I would say, "always paint plausibly". You see if
a painting isn't plausible to the viewer then nothing
else you can do will make it that way.
Jan
- Your mentor, Maxmillian Rasko, he was a portrait
painter?
Helen
- Oh he was much more than just that. He was a teacher.
I mean a real teacher, the sort whose every waking
moment is devoted to showing you the way. One time
he went out and bought a big bag of apples. He poured
them out onto a table and told me, "Now spend the
day painting these apples". So I did as I was told.
When the painting was completed,
he went over and put the apples back into the bag.
Then he brought me the bag of apples and said, "All
right now, I want you to pull each apple out of the
bag and tell me which one is which in your painting!"
It was a tough lesson in the difference between knowing
- as we all do - that no two apples are alike, and
actually painting them so you could tell them
apart!
Jan
- Who is Gertrude?
Helen
- (Laughs) Gertrude was a student in a seminar some
time ago. She painted a beautiful pear with an unusual
lump in it. The lump was so counter to the rest of
the painting, I asked her why she put it there. "Because
it WAS there," she said. Well that's a good example
of why the artist should be in charge. She would have
been much better off omitting the lump, because it
drew the viewer's eye straight to the lump and you
missed the beauty of the succulent pear. She should
have painted what should BE, not necessarily
what she saw. There's that plausibility thing again.
(Note: the following
is my favorite of all the thousands of "Helenisms"
Jan
- You really put everything into painting! In this
morning's demonstration you finished with your hands
and arms covered with paint, it's on your blouse,
the floor. You really get into it!
Helen
- (feigning surprise!) Well that's the essense of
most artists' problems with painting, you know. Timidity.
You CAN'T be timid. Don't be in awe of painting. Don't
be afraid of the process! Grab it with gusto and beat
the CRAP out of it!"
After the interview we went
back into our final afternoon of class and everyone
departed with best wishes for their homes around the
country.
|